Patient knowledge, antibiotic abuse, and impolite physicians

Antibiotic overuse causes great social harm yet is largely absent from public discussion of drug policy. There is a textbook external effect of an antibiotic prescription: the more antibiotics are used, the higher the risk we all face of resistant infections. As a result, there tends to be too much use of antibiotics. There have been ongoing efforts to reduce use of antibiotics, particularly in the context of treating respiratory infections, in part by educating GPs, the supply side of the relationship, on appropriate use.

In “Patient knowledge and antibiotic abuse: Evidence from an audit study in China” Janet Currie, Wanchuan Lin, and Wei Zhang consider the demand side of the relationship: what is the effect of patient knowledge on antibiotic use? The authors use a field experiment conducted in China, where antibiotic abuse is particularly severe possibly because physicians have substantial financial incentives to write expensive prescriptions.

We sent pairs of well-matched simulated patients, A and B, to the same physician, with a short time interval between their audits. The pair followed the same transcript except that following the physical examination, patient A said “I learned from the internet that simple flu/cold patients should not take antibiotics.” Thus, A signaled to the physician that they had some knowledge of inappropriate antibiotic use, while B did not.

We find that the signal reduced the probability of receiving an antibiotic prescription by 25 percentage points, from 64% for patient B to 39% for patient A. The signal also reduced drug expenditures from an average of 145.81 RMB for patient B to 105.84 RMB for patient A. Finally, patients who signaled knowledge of antibiotics received more information about possible drug side effects than apparently uninformed patients, but fewer polite responses from physicians.

Estimating the extent of demand inducement is notoriously difficult, and this experimental evidence is striking. I wonder if informed patients would still encounter rude responses from physicians if the physician’s compensation were held constant?

2 Comments to “Patient knowledge, antibiotic abuse, and impolite physicians”

  1. Chris, I’ve heard physicians say “beware of geeks bearing lists” – which pretty much captures their attitude towards patients who “signal knowledge.”

    These results don’t surprise me.

  2. Yeah, I’ve generated cold stares from physicians by asking for references or for discussing papers in the medical literature. I do wonder, though, how much of the rudeness effect Currie et al measure is because signalling knowledge in the Chinese context means the physician’s compensation is likely to be much lower.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s